↓ Skip to main content

Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-13-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Donna Spiegelman, Adam A Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard, Joel D Kaufman, Jeff D Yanosky, Ronald Williams, Francine Laden, Biling Hong, Helen Suh

Abstract

Exposure measurement error is a concern in long-term PM2.5 health studies using ambient concentrations as exposures. We assessed error magnitude by estimating calibration coefficients as the association between personal PM2.5 exposures from validation studies and typically available surrogate exposures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 17 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#905,393
of 21,740,538 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#200
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,724
of 307,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#17
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,740,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.