You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-202 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cath Taylor, Louise Atkins, Alison Richardson, Ruth Tarrant, Amanda-Jane Ramirez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,478,235
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,975
of 8,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,646
of 165,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.