↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Mitochondrial injury, oxidative stress and apoptosis – there is nothing more practical than a good theory

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Mitochondrial injury, oxidative stress and apoptosis – there is nothing more practical than a good theory
Published in
Critical Care, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hülya Bayir, Valerian E Kagan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 175 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,119
of 96,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.