You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors affecting uptake of optimal doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in six districts of Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amon Exavery, Godfrey Mbaruku, Selemani Mbuyita, Ahmed Makemba, Iddajovana P Kinyonge, Hadija Kweka |
Abstract |
Intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with optimal doses (two+) of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) protects pregnant women from malaria-related adverse outcomes. This study assesses the extent and predictors of uptake of optimal doses of IPTp-SP in six districts of Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malawi | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 232 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 71 | 30% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
Researcher | 27 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 47 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
Other | 36 | 15% |
Unknown | 53 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,876,875
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,892
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,367
of 316,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#47
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.