You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled weight loss trial among lactating overweight/obese women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars A Hagberg, Hilde K Brekke, Fredrik Bertz, Anna Winkvist |
| Abstract |
Overweight and obesity among young, adult women are increasing problems in Sweden as in many other countries. The postpartum period may be a good opportunity to improve eating habits and lose weight in a sustainable manner. The aim was to make a cost-utility analysis of a dietary behavior modification treatment alongside usual care, compared to usual care alone, among lactating overweight and obese women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 18% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,309,485
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,782
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,741
of 336,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#88
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.