↓ Skip to main content

Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip significantly impairs driving ability (cross-sectional survey)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip significantly impairs driving ability (cross-sectional survey)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulf Krister Hofmann, Maurice Jordan, Ina Rondak, Petra Wolf, Torsten Kluba, Ingmar Ipach

Abstract

Advising patients about when they can drive after surgery is common practice after arthroplasty of the knee or hip. In the literature, the preoperative braking performance values of the patients are frequently taken as the "safe" landmark. We hypothesised that osteoarthritis (OA), the most frequent reason for arthroplasty, already compromises the ability to perform an emergency stop. We expected that both Reaction Time (RT) and Movement Time (MT) as components of the Total Brake Response Time (TBRT), would be prolonged in patients with OA of the knee or hip in comparison with healthy subjects. We also expected maximum pressure levels on the brake pedal to be reduced in such cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,070,011
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#414
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,101
of 308,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.