You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Update in acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-0492-2-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Younsuck Koh |
| Abstract |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by permeability pulmonary edema and refractory hypoxemia. Recently, the new definition of ARDS has been published, and this definition suggested severity-oriented respiratory treatment by introducing three levels of severity according to PaO2/FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure. Lung-protective ventilation is still the key of better outcome in ARDS. Through randomized trials, short-term use of neuromuscular blockade at initial stage of mechanical ventilation, prone ventilation in severe ARDS, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in ARDS with influenza pneumonia showed beneficial efficacy. However, ARDS mortality still remains high. Therefore, early recognition of ARDS modified risk factors and the avoidance of aggravating factors during the patient's hospital stay can help decrease its development. In addition, efficient antifibrotic strategies in late-stage ARDS should be developed to improve the outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 16% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 52 | 25% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,779,985
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#138
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,995
of 316,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them