You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti-plasmodial action of de novo-designed, cationic, lysine-branched, amphipathic, helical peptides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-256 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naveen K Kaushik, Jyotsna Sharma, Dinkar Sahal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,468
of 5,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,125
of 165,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.