↓ Skip to main content

PCR-based methods for the detection of L1014 kdr mutation in Anopheles culicifacies sensu lato

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PCR-based methods for the detection of L1014 kdr mutation in Anopheles culicifacies sensu lato
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Om P Singh, Prerna Bali, Janet Hemingway, Sarala K Subbarao, Aditya P Dash, Tridibes Adak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Madagascar 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,468
of 5,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,323
of 110,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.