You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fermented foods, microbiota, and mental health: ancient practice meets nutritional psychiatry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1880-6805-33-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva M Selhub, Alan C Logan, Alison C Bested |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 8% |
| Canada | 16 | 7% |
| Spain | 15 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 185 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 12% |
| Scientists | 16 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 796 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 781 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 201 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 120 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 12% |
| Researcher | 79 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 107 | 13% |
| Unknown | 154 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 159 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 8% |
| Psychology | 43 | 5% |
| Other | 135 | 17% |
| Unknown | 179 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 526. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#48,216
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#4
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365
of 338,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them