↓ Skip to main content

Natural antisense RNAs as mRNA regulatory elements in bacteria: a review on function and applications

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 477)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural antisense RNAs as mRNA regulatory elements in bacteria: a review on function and applications
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s11658-016-0007-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatemeh Saberi, Mehdi Kamali, Ali Najafi, Alavieh Yazdanparast, Mehrdad Moosazadeh Moghaddam

Abstract

Naturally occurring antisense RNAs are small, diffusible, untranslated transcripts that pair to target RNAs at specific regions of complementarity to control their biological function by regulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. This review focuses on known cases of antisense RNA control in prokaryotes and provides an overview of some natural RNA-based mechanisms that bacteria use to modulate gene expression, such as mRNA sensors, riboswitches and antisense RNAs. We also highlight recent advances in RNA-based technology. The review shows that studies on both natural and synthetic systems are reciprocally beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 196 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 6%
Engineering 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,987,449
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#38
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,769
of 365,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them