You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation of biological therapy for the management of active psoriatic arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Richard Cawson, Stephen Andrew Mitchell, Chris Knight, Henry Wildey, Dean Spurden, Alex Bird, Michelle Elaine Orme |
| Abstract |
An updated economic evaluation was conducted to compare the cost-effectiveness of the four tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab in active, progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) where response to standard treatment has been inadequate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,120
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,420
of 305,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#74
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.