↓ Skip to main content

Network mirroring for drug repositioning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network mirroring for drug repositioning
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12911-017-0449-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunghong Park, Dong-gi Lee, Hyunjung Shin

Abstract

Although drug discoveries can provide meaningful insights and significant enhancements in pharmaceutical field, the longevity and cost that it takes can be extensive where the success rate is low. In order to circumvent the problem, there has been increased interest in 'Drug Repositioning' where one searches for already approved drugs that have high potential of efficacy when applied to other diseases. To increase the success rate for drug repositioning, one considers stepwise screening and experiments based on biological reactions. Given the amount of drugs and diseases, however, the one-by-one procedure may be time consuming and expensive. In this study, we propose a machine learning based approach for efficiently selecting candidate diseases and drugs. We assume that if two diseases are similar, then a drug for one disease can be effective against the other disease too. For the procedure, we first construct two disease networks; one with disease-protein association and the other with disease-drug information. If two networks are dissimilar, in a sense that the edge distribution of a disease node differ, it indicates high potential for repositioning new candidate drugs for that disease. The Kullback-Leibler divergence is employed to measure difference of connections in two constructed disease networks. Lastly, we perform repositioning of drugs to the top 20% ranked diseases. The results showed that F-measure of the proposed method was 0.75, outperforming 0.5 of greedy searching for the entire diseases. For the utility of the proposed method, it was applied to dementia and verified 75% accuracy for repositioned drugs assuming that there are not any known drugs to be used for dementia. This research has novelty in that it discovers drugs with high potential of repositioning based on disease networks with the quantitative measure. Through the study, it is expected to produce profound insights for possibility of undiscovered drug repositioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Computer Science 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,462,982
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,322
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,889
of 313,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.