↓ Skip to main content

Multi-modal imaging and anatomic classification of the white dot syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 262)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-modal imaging and anatomic classification of the white dot syndromes
Published in
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40942-017-0069-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meisha L. Raven, Alexander L. Ringeisen, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Maxwell S. Stem, Lisa J. Faia, Justin L. Gottlieb

Abstract

The white dot syndromes (WDS) are a diverse group of posterior uveitidies that share similar clinical findings but are unique from one another. Multimodal imaging has allowed us to better understand the morphology, the activity and age of lesions, and whether there is CNV associated with these different ocular pathologies. The "white dot syndromes" and their uveitic masqueraders can now be anatomically categorized based on lesion localization. The categories include local uveitic syndromes with choroidal pathology, systemic uveitic syndromes with choroidal pathology, and multifocal choroiditis with outer retinal/choriocapillaris pathology with uveitis and without uveitis. Neoplastic and infectious etiologies are also discussed given their ability to masquerade as WDS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 16 18%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,416,577
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#23
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,020
of 323,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.