Title |
Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan F Murray, Benjamin M Hunter, Ramila Bisht, Tim Ensor, Debra Bick |
Abstract |
Demand-side financing, where funds for specific services are channelled through, or to, prospective users, is now employed in health and education sectors in many low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review aimed to critically examine the evidence on application of this approach to promote maternal health in these settings. Five modes were considered: unconditional cash transfers, conditional cash transfers, short-term payments to offset costs of accessing maternity services, vouchers for maternity services, and vouchers for merit goods. We sought to assess the effects of these interventions on utilisation of maternity services and on maternal health outcomes and infant health, the situation of underprivileged women and the healthcare system. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
South Africa | 2 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 327 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 74 | 22% |
Researcher | 60 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 54 | 16% |
Unknown | 58 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 60 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 4% |
Other | 33 | 10% |
Unknown | 75 | 22% |