↓ Skip to main content

Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan F Murray, Benjamin M Hunter, Ramila Bisht, Tim Ensor, Debra Bick

Abstract

Demand-side financing, where funds for specific services are channelled through, or to, prospective users, is now employed in health and education sectors in many low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review aimed to critically examine the evidence on application of this approach to promote maternal health in these settings. Five modes were considered: unconditional cash transfers, conditional cash transfers, short-term payments to offset costs of accessing maternity services, vouchers for maternity services, and vouchers for merit goods. We sought to assess the effects of these interventions on utilisation of maternity services and on maternal health outcomes and infant health, the situation of underprivileged women and the healthcare system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Bangladesh 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 327 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 22%
Researcher 60 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Student > Postgraduate 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 58 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 29%
Social Sciences 60 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 4%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,390,936
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#655
of 4,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,905
of 304,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#25
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.