↓ Skip to main content

The potential use of chickpeas in development of infant follow-on formula

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential use of chickpeas in development of infant follow-on formula
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lovemore Nkhata Malunga, Shimrit Dadon Bar-El, Eli Zinal, Zipi Berkovich, Shahal Abbo, Ram Reifen

Abstract

Undernutrition during childhood is a common disorder in the developing countries, however most research has focussed much on its treatment rather than its prevention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,353,445
of 13,782,054 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#396
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,890
of 246,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,782,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them