You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of interactive multimedia interventions to promote children’s communication with health professionals: implications for communicating with overweight children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Raaff, Cris Glazebrook, Heather Wharrad |
| Abstract |
Interactive multimedia is an emerging technology that is being used to facilitate interactions between patients and health professionals. The purpose of this review was to identify and evaluate the impact of multimedia interventions (MIs), delivered in the context of paediatric healthcare, in order to inform the development of a MI to promote the communication of dietetic messages with overweight preadolescent children. Of particular interest were the effects of these MIs on child engagement and participation in treatment, and the subsequent effect on health-related treatment outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 22% |
| Colombia | 2 | 11% |
| Cuba | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,677,527
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#198
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,290
of 305,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.