↓ Skip to main content

Resuscitation and resurrection: The ethics of cloning cheetahs, mammoths, and Neanderthals

Overview of attention for article published in Life Sciences, Society and Policy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 132)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resuscitation and resurrection: The ethics of cloning cheetahs, mammoths, and Neanderthals
Published in
Life Sciences, Society and Policy, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2195-7819-10-3
Authors

Sariah Cottrell, Jamie L Jensen, Steven L Peck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 31%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,117,883
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#12
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,875
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them