↓ Skip to main content

The effects of a psychological intervention directed at optimizing immune function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of a psychological intervention directed at optimizing immune function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1983-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lemmy Schakel, Dieuwke S. Veldhuijzen, Henriët van Middendorp, Corine Prins, Simone A. Joosten, Tom H. M. Ottenhoff, Leo G. Visser, Andrea W. M. Evers

Abstract

Previous research has provided evidence for the link between psychological processes and psychophysiological health outcomes. Psychological interventions, such as face-to-face or online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and serious games aimed at improving health, have shown promising results in promoting health outcomes. Few studies so far, however, have examined whether Internet-based CBT combined with serious gaming elements is effective in modulating health outcomes. Moreover, studies often did not incorporate psychophysiological or immunological challenges in order to gain insight into physiological responses to real-life challenges after psychological interventions. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the effects of a psychological intervention on self-reported and physiological health outcomes in response to immune and psychophysiological challenges. In a randomized controlled trial, 60 healthy men are randomly assigned to either an experimental condition, receiving guided Internet-based (e-health) CBT combined with health-related serious gaming elements for 6 weeks, or a control condition receiving no intervention. After the psychological intervention, self-reported vitality is measured, and participants are given an immunological challenge in the form of a Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination. One day after the vaccination, participants are asked to perform several psychophysiological tasks in order to explore the effects of the psychological intervention on participants' stress response following the immune challenge. To assess the delayed effects of vaccination on self-reported and physiological health outcomes, a follow-up visit is planned 4 weeks later. Total study duration is approximately 14 weeks. The primary outcome measure is self-reported vitality measured directly after the intervention. Secondary outcome measures include inflammatory and endocrine markers, as well as psychophysiological measures of heart rate and skin conductance in response to the psychophysiological tasks after the BCG vaccination. The innovative design features of this study - e.g., combining guided e-health CBT with health-related serious gaming elements and incorporating immunological and psychophysiological challenges - will provide valuable information on the effects of a psychological intervention on both self-reported and physiological health outcomes. This study will offer further insights into the mechanisms underlying the link between psychological factors and health outcomes and is anticipated to contribute to the optimization of health care strategies. Nederlands Trial Register, NTR5610 . Registered on 4 January 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 68 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 76 37%