↓ Skip to main content

BMC medicine editorial board members on open access publishing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BMC medicine editorial board members on open access publishing
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R Carmont, Stephen D Lawn, Babill Stray-Pedersen, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Pascal Meier

Abstract

In recognition of Open Access week (21st-27th October 2013), we asked some BMC Medicine Editorial Board Members to share their views and experiences on open access publishing. In this short video, they highlight the benefits of visibility and dissemination of their research, and discuss the future directions for this model of publishing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 4 36%
Professor 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,304,167
of 24,416,081 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,030
of 3,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,744
of 315,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#44
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,416,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.