↓ Skip to main content

Some considerations for analyzing biodiversity using integrative metagenomics and gene networks

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Some considerations for analyzing biodiversity using integrative metagenomics and gene networks
Published in
Biology Direct, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-5-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Bittner, Sébastien Halary, Claude Payri, Corinne Cruaud, Bruno de Reviers, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 3%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 3 1%
Sweden 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 191 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 24%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 14 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Environmental Science 14 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 21 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,092,499
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#167
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,884
of 93,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.