↓ Skip to main content

Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: a mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: a mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana Lee Olstad, Laksiri A Goonewardene, Linda J McCargar, Kim D Raine

Abstract

Nudging is an approach to environmental change that alters social and physical environments to shift behaviors in positive, self-interested directions. Evidence indicates that eating is largely an automatic behavior governed by environmental cues, suggesting that it might be possible to nudge healthier dietary behaviors. This study assessed the comparative and additive efficacy of two nudges and an economic incentive in supporting healthy food purchases by patrons at a recreational swimming pool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 56 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 12%
Social Sciences 29 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 9%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Other 68 25%
Unknown 71 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#828,774
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#263
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,865
of 320,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.