You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of a national quality improvement collaborative on prehospital care for acute myocardial infarction and stroke in England
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Deborah Shaw, Nadya Essam, Fiona Jayne Togher, Zowie Davy, Anne Spaight, Michael Dewey |
Abstract |
Previous studies have shown wide variations in prehospital ambulance care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) for improving ambulance care for AMI and stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 18 | 47% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
Scientists | 10 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 23% |
Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#609,203
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#61
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,828
of 309,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.