↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a national quality improvement collaborative on prehospital care for acute myocardial infarction and stroke in England

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of a national quality improvement collaborative on prehospital care for acute myocardial infarction and stroke in England
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Deborah Shaw, Nadya Essam, Fiona Jayne Togher, Zowie Davy, Anne Spaight, Michael Dewey

Abstract

Previous studies have shown wide variations in prehospital ambulance care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) for improving ambulance care for AMI and stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#530,074
of 21,742,867 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#59
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,136
of 290,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,742,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them