↓ Skip to main content

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 113)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opening peer-review: the democracy of science
Published in
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-5751-13-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R Shanahan, Bjorn R Olsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Computer Science 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,103,878
of 25,139,853 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#6
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,218
of 319,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,139,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.