You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department: a qualitative study of staff perceptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1940-0640-9-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Katz, Monica W Paez, Heather S Reisinger, Meghan T Gillette, Mark W Vander Weg, Marita G Titler, Andrew S Nugent, Laurence J Baker, John E Holman, Sarah S Ono |
| Abstract |
The US Public Health Service smoking cessation practice guideline specifically recommends that physicians and nurses strongly advise their patients who use tobacco to quit, but the best approach for attaining this goal in the emergency department (ED) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize emergency physicians' (EPs) and nurses' (ENs) perceptions of cessation counseling and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of the 5 A's framework (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange) in the ED. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#256
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,959
of 320,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.