↓ Skip to main content

Comparative absorption of curcumin formulations

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
16 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative absorption of curcumin formulations
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf Jäger, Ryan P Lowery, Allison V Calvanese, Jordan M Joy, Martin Purpura, Jacob M Wilson

Abstract

The potential health benefits of curcumin are limited by its poor solubility, low absorption from the gut, rapid metabolism and rapid systemic elimination. The purpose of this study was the comparative measurement of the increases in levels of curcuminoids (curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin) and the metabolite tetrahydrocurcumin after oral administration of three different curcumin formulations in comparison to unformulated standard.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 550 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 92 17%
Student > Master 84 15%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Other 39 7%
Other 85 15%
Unknown 135 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 57 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 9%
Chemistry 39 7%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 156 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#349,230
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#111
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,387
of 319,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.