↓ Skip to main content

An unsupervised learning approach for tracking mice in an enclosed area

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An unsupervised learning approach for tracking mice in an enclosed area
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1681-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob Unger, Mike Mansour, Marcin Kopaczka, Nina Gronloh, Marc Spehr, Dorit Merhof

Abstract

In neuroscience research, mouse models are valuable tools to understand the genetic mechanisms that advance evidence-based discovery. In this context, large-scale studies emphasize the need for automated high-throughput systems providing a reproducible behavioral assessment of mutant mice with only a minimum level of manual intervention. Basic element of such systems is a robust tracking algorithm. However, common tracking algorithms are either limited by too specific model assumptions or have to be trained in an elaborate preprocessing step, which drastically limits their applicability for behavioral analysis. We present an unsupervised learning procedure that is basically built as a two-stage process to track mice in an enclosed area using shape matching and deformable segmentation models. The system is validated by comparing the tracking results with previously manually labeled landmarks in three setups with different environment, contrast and lighting conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the system is able to automatically detect non-social and social behavior of interacting mice. The system demonstrates a high level of tracking accuracy and clearly outperforms the MiceProfiler, a recently proposed tracking software, which serves as benchmark for our experiments. The proposed method shows promising potential to automate behavioral screening of mice and other animals. Therefore, it could substantially increase the experimental throughput in behavioral assessment automation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Computer Science 6 10%
Psychology 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,883
of 7,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,981
of 313,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#95
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.