You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the social context of fatal road traffic collisions among young people: a qualitative analysis of narrative text in coroners’ records
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Pilkington, Emma Bird, Selena Gray, Elizabeth Towner, Sarah Weld, Mary-Ann McKibben |
| Abstract |
Deaths and injuries on the road remain a major cause of premature death among young people across the world. Routinely collected data usually focuses on the mechanism of road traffic collisions and basic demographic data of those involved. This study aimed to supplement these routine sources with a thematic analysis of narrative text contained in coroners' records, to explore the wider social context in which collisions occur. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 24% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,360,409
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,679
of 15,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,961
of 315,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#51
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.