You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Networking among young global health researchers through an intensive training approach: a mixed methods exploratory study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lindsey M Lenters, Donald C Cole, Paula Godoy-Ruiz |
Abstract |
Networks are increasingly regarded as essential in health research aimed at influencing practice and policies. Less research has focused on the role networking can play in researchers' careers and its broader impacts on capacity strengthening in health research. We used the Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research (CCGHR) annual Summer Institute for New Global Health Researchers (SIs) as an opportunity to explore networking among new global health researchers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 31% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Thailand | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sierra Leone | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Librarian | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,148,835
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#438
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,535
of 322,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.