You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children’s school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte D Klinker, Jasper Schipperijn, Hayley Christian, Jacqueline Kerr, Annette K Ersbøll, Jens Troelsen |
| Abstract |
Knowledge on domain-specific physical activity (PA) has the potential to advance public health interventions and inform new policies promoting children's PA. The purpose of this study is to identify and assess domains (leisure, school, transport, home) and subdomains (e.g., recess, playgrounds, and urban green space) for week day moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) using objective measures and investigate gender and age differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,164,709
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#779
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,466
of 320,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.