↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive interviews guide design of a new CAM patient expectations questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive interviews guide design of a new CAM patient expectations questionnaire
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen J Sherman, Emery R Eaves, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Clarissa Hsu, Daniel C Cherkin, Judith A Turner

Abstract

No consistent relationship exists between pre-treatment expectations and therapeutic benefit from various complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies in clinical trials. However, many different expectancy measures have been used in those studies, with no validated questionnaires clearly focused on CAM and pain. We undertook cognitive interviews as part of a process to develop and validate such a questionnaire.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Psychology 18 14%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,382,343
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,223
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,712
of 306,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#29
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.