↓ Skip to main content

Socioeconomic factors associated with trajectories of caring by young and mid-aged women: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socioeconomic factors associated with trajectories of caring by young and mid-aged women: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leigh Tooth, Gita Mishra

Abstract

The health and socioeconomic outcomes from being a caregiver are well described. In contrast, the long-term trajectories of caring undertaken by women, and the demographic, socioeconomic status, health status and health behaviour characteristics associated with these trajectories is not well known.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Psychology 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,493,626
of 12,016,495 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,879
of 8,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,417
of 211,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#179
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,016,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.