You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Schumm, Simon Greulich, Anja Wagner, Stefan Grün, Peter Ong, Kerstin Bentz, Karin Klingel, Reinhard Kandolf, Oliver Bruder, Steffen Schneider, Udo Sechtem, Heiko Mahrholdt |
| Abstract |
The diagnosis of myocarditis is challenging due to its varying clinical presentation. Since myocarditis can be associated with significant 5-year mortality, and postmortem data show myocarditis in almost 10% of all adults suffering sudden cardiac death, individual risk stratification for patients with suspected myocarditis is of great clinical interest. We sought to demonstrate that patients with clinically suspected myocarditis and a normal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) according to our definition have a good prognosis, independent of their clinical symptoms and other findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,488,843
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#388
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,523
of 323,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.