↓ Skip to main content

Pathogen-free, plasma-poor platelet lysate and expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogen-free, plasma-poor platelet lysate and expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Iudicone, Daniela Fioravanti, Giuseppina Bonanno, Michelina Miceli, Claudio Lavorino, Pierangela Totta, Luigi Frati, Marianna Nuti, Luca Pierelli

Abstract

Supplements to support clinical-grade cultures of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are required to promote growth and expansion of these cells. Platelet lysate (PL) is a human blood component which may replace animal serum in MSC cultures being rich in various growth factors. Here, we describe a plasma poor pathogen-free platelet lysate obtained by pooling 12 platelet (PLT) units, to produce a standardized and safe supplement for clinical-grade expansion of MSC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895,186
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#311
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,754
of 313,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#8
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.