You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys
|
---|---|
Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-7-48 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher J Corbett, Sandy Love, Anna Moore, Faith A Burden, Jacqui B Matthews, Matthew J Denwood |
Abstract |
The level of anthelmintic resistance within some cyathostomin parasite populations has increased to the level where sole reliance on anthelmintic-based control protocols is not possible. Management-based nematode control methods, including removal of faeces from pasture, are widely recommended for use in association with a reduction in anthelmintic use to reduce selection pressure for drug resistance; however, very little work has been performed to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of such methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 27% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 23 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,854
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,067
of 320,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#26
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.