↓ Skip to main content

Declining malaria in Africa: improving the measurement of progress

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Declining malaria in Africa: improving the measurement of progress
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter W Gething, Katherine E Battle, Samir Bhatt, David L Smith, Thomas P Eisele, Richard E Cibulskis, Simon I Hay

Abstract

The dramatic escalation of malaria control activities in Africa since the year 2000 has increased the importance of accurate measurements of impact on malaria epidemiology and burden. This study presents a systematic review of the emerging published evidence base on trends in malaria risk in Africa and argues that more systematic, timely, and empirically-based approaches are urgently needed to track the rapidly evolving landscape of transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,134,154
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#164
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,978
of 317,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#4
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.