↓ Skip to main content

Identifying driver mutations in sequenced cancer genomes: computational approaches to enable precision medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying driver mutations in sequenced cancer genomes: computational approaches to enable precision medicine
Published in
Genome Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/gm524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin J Raphael, Jason R Dobson, Layla Oesper, Fabio Vandin

Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing is revolutionizing the study of cancer and enabling the measurement of the somatic mutations that drive cancer development. However, the resulting sequencing datasets are large and complex, obscuring the clinically important mutations in a background of errors, noise, and random mutations. Here, we review computational approaches to identify somatic mutations in cancer genome sequences and to distinguish the driver mutations that are responsible for cancer from random, passenger mutations. First, we describe approaches to detect somatic mutations from high-throughput DNA sequencing data, particularly for tumor samples that comprise heterogeneous populations of cells. Next, we review computational approaches that aim to predict driver mutations according to their frequency of occurrence in a cohort of samples, or according to their predicted functional impact on protein sequence or structure. Finally, we review techniques to identify recurrent combinations of somatic mutations, including approaches that examine mutations in known pathways or protein-interaction networks, as well as de novo approaches that identify combinations of mutations according to statistical patterns of mutual exclusivity. These techniques, coupled with advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing, are enabling precision medicine approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 453 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 26%
Researcher 94 20%
Student > Bachelor 53 11%
Student > Master 51 11%
Other 27 6%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 71 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 137 29%
Computer Science 40 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 8%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 78 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,255,632
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#497
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,671
of 322,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.