↓ Skip to main content

Resolution of the three dimensional structure of components of the glomerular filtration barrier

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resolution of the three dimensional structure of components of the glomerular filtration barrier
Published in
BMC Nephrology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-15-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenton P Arkill, Klaus Qvortrup, Tobias Starborg, Judith M Mantell, Carlo Knupp, C Charles Michel, Steve J Harper, Andy HJ Salmon, John M Squire, Dave O Bates, Chris R Neal

Abstract

The human glomerulus is the primary filtration unit of the kidney, and contains the Glomerular Filtration Barrier (GFB). The GFB had been thought to comprise 3 layers - the endothelium, the basement membrane and the podocyte foot processes. However, recent studies have suggested that at least two additional layers contribute to the function of the GFB, the endothelial glycocalyx on the vascular side, and the sub-podocyte space on the urinary side. To investigate the structure of these additional layers is difficult as it requires three-dimensional reconstruction of delicate sub-microscopic (<1 μm) cellular and extracellular elements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Engineering 4 5%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,512,452
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#87
of 2,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,741
of 324,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.