↓ Skip to main content

“No one says ‘No’ to money” – a mixed methods approach for evaluating conditional cash transfer schemes to improve girl children’s status in Haryana, India

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“No one says ‘No’ to money” – a mixed methods approach for evaluating conditional cash transfer schemes to improve girl children’s status in Haryana, India
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-13-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Krishnan, Ritvik Amarchand, Peter Byass, Chandrakant Pandav, Nawi Ng

Abstract

Haryana was the first state in India to launch a conditional cash transfer (CCT) scheme in 1994. Initially it targeted all disadvantaged girls but was revised in 2005 to restrict it to second girl children of all groups. The benefit which accrued at girl attaining 18 years and subject to conditionalities of being fully immunized, studying till class 10 and remaining unmarried, was increased from about US$ 500 to US$ 2000. Using a mixed methods approach, we evaluated the implementation and possible impact of these two schemes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Social Sciences 24 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 45 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,071
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,340
of 322,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.