You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hypofractionated SBRT versus conventionally fractionated EBRT for prostate cancer: comparison of PSA slope and nadir
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-9-42 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mekhail Anwar, Vivian Weinberg, Albert J Chang, I-Chow Hsu, Mack Roach, Alexander Gottschalk |
Abstract |
Patients with early stage prostate cancer have a variety of curative radiotherapy options, including conventionally-fractionated external beam radiotherapy (CF-EBRT) and hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Although results of CF-EBRT are well known, the use of SBRT for prostate cancer is a more recent development, and long-term follow-up is not yet available. However, rapid post-treatment PSA decline and low PSA nadir have been linked to improved clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the PSA kinetics between CF-EBRT and SBRT in newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 21% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 57% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,040
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,688
of 307,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#43
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.