↓ Skip to main content

Reviewer acknowledgement 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reviewer acknowledgement 2013
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-7-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hylton Menz, Mike Potter

Abstract

The Editors of Journal of Foot and Ankle Research would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 6 (2013).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,180,184
of 4,504,869 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#235
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,981
of 123,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.