↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of cardiac pathology by point-of-care ultrasonography performed by a novice examiner is comparable to the gold standard

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of cardiac pathology by point-of-care ultrasonography performed by a novice examiner is comparable to the gold standard
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-21-87
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Alcaraz Frederiksen, Peter Juhl-Olsen, Niels Holmark Andersen, Erik Sloth

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasonography performed by a novice examiner against results from a specialist in cardiology with expert skills in echocardiography, with regard to the assessment of six clinically relevant cardiac conditions in a population of ward patients from the Department of Cardiology or the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Lecturer 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,106,943
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#621
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,366
of 307,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.