You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using high-density DNA methylation arrays to profile copy number alterations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Feber, Paul Guilhamon, Matthias Lechner, Tim Fenton, Gareth A Wilson, Christina Thirlwell, Tiffany J Morris, Adrienne M Flanagan, Andrew E Teschendorff, John D Kelly, Stephan Beck |
| Abstract |
The integration of genomic and epigenomic data is an increasingly popular approach for studying the complex mechanisms driving cancer development. We have developed a method for evaluating both methylation and copy number from high-density DNA methylation arrays. Comparing copy number data from Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips and SNP arrays, we demonstrate that Infinium arrays detect copy number alterations with the sensitivity of SNP platforms. These results show that high-density methylation arrays provide a robust and economic platform for detecting copy number and methylation changes in a single experiment. Our method is available in the ChAMP Bioconductor package: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/ChAMP.html. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 163 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,251,334
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#932
of 4,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,645
of 324,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#29
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.