Title |
Cannibalism in invasive, native and biocontrol populations of the harlequin ladybird
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashraf Tayeh, Arnaud Estoup, Eric Lombaert, Thomas Guillemaud, Natalia Kirichenko, Lori Lawson-Handley, Patrick De Clercq, Benoît Facon |
Abstract |
Cannibalism is widespread in both vertebrates and invertebrates but its extent is variable between and within species. Cannibalism depends on population density and nutritional conditions, and could be beneficial during colonisation of new environments. Empirical studies are needed to determine whether this trait might facilitate invasion of a new area in natural systems. We investigated whether the propensity for cannibalism in H. axyridis differs both between native and invasive populations and between invasive populations from the core and from the front of the invasive area in Western Europe. We also compared the propensity for cannibalism of these natural populations with that of laboratory-reared biocontrol populations. We measured the cannibalism rates of eggs by first instar larvae and adult females at two different individual densities of ladybirds from three types of population (invasive, native and biocontrol), in laboratory-controlled conditions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Researcher | 9 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |