You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The return-to-work process of individuals sick-listed because of whiplash-associated disorder: a three-year follow-up study in a Danish cohort of long-term sickness absentees
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-113 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Biering-Sørensen, Anne Møller, Christian DG Stoltenberg, Jonas W Holm, Peder G Skov |
Abstract |
The chronic course of whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) has implications for both the individual and society. It has been shown that up to 50% of patients have not yet returned to work six months after a whiplash injury. We wanted to study the return-to-work (RTW) process in individuals sick-listed for more than eight weeks in six Danish municipalities. RTW in individuals sick-listed due to WAD was compared to that in those sick-listed for other musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 16% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,189,417
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,299
of 14,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,687
of 307,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#191
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.