You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective components of feedback from Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in youth mental health care: study protocol of a three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-14-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maartje AMS van Sonsbeek, Giel GJM Hutschemaekers, Jan Willem Veerman, Bea BG Tiemens |
| Abstract |
Routine Outcome Monitoring refers to regular measurements of clients' progress in clinical practice, aiming to evaluate and, if necessary, adapt treatment. Clients fill out questionnaires and clinicians receive feedback about the results. Studies concerning feedback in youth mental health care are rare. The effects of feedback, the importance of specific aspects of feedback, and the mechanisms underlying the effects of feedback are unknown. In the present study, several potentially effective components of feedback from Routine Outcome Monitoring in youth mental health care in the Netherlands are investigated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,908,825
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,909
of 4,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,676
of 304,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#53
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.