↓ Skip to main content

Red blood cell distribution width is not correlated with preeclampsia among pregnant Sudanese women

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red blood cell distribution width is not correlated with preeclampsia among pregnant Sudanese women
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-9-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hala Abdullahi, Ameer Osman, Duria A Rayis, Gasim I Gasim, Abdulmutalab M Imam, Ishag Adam

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide. The exact etiology of preeclampsia is unknown, but the inflammatory process is postulated as one of the etiologies. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a measure of anisocytosis (variation of red cell size) and is associated with hypertension and diabetic ketoacidosis. There are few data on the association between RDW and preeclampsia. This study aimed to investigate the association between RDW and preeclampsia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,646,666
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#481
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,039
of 307,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#13
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.