↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of PROforma as a language for implementing medical guidelines in a practical context

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of PROforma as a language for implementing medical guidelines in a practical context
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-6-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Sutton, Paul Taylor, Kenneth Earle

Abstract

PROforma is one of several languages that allow clinical guidelines to be expressed in a computer-interpretable manner. How these languages should be compared, and what requirements they should meet, are questions that are being actively addressed by a community of interested researchers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Colombia 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,308
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,424
of 66,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.