You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of GoGirlGo!; A practitioner based program to improve physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer L Huberty, Danae M Dinkel, Michael W Beets |
| Abstract |
GoGirlGo! (GGG) is designed to increase girls' physical activity (PA) using a health behavior and PA-based curriculum and is widely available for free to afterschool programs across the nation. However, GGG has not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the GGG curricula to improve PA, and self-efficacy for and enjoyment of PA in elementary aged girls (i.e., 5-13 years). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,334,755
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,463
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,791
of 312,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#100
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.