↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy secondary to adipose infiltration as a cause of episodic collapse in a horse

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Veterinary Journal, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy secondary to adipose infiltration as a cause of episodic collapse in a horse
Published in
Irish Veterinary Journal, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13620-017-0099-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra G. Raftery, Nerea Cuesta-Garcia, Hal Thompson, David G. M. Sutton, Alexandra G. Raftery, Nerea Cuesta-Garcia, Hal Thompson, David G. M. Sutton

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13620-015-0052-3.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,742,246
of 11,357,505 outputs
Outputs from Irish Veterinary Journal
#78
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,951
of 267,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Veterinary Journal
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,357,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.